@mastersthesis {1993,
	title = {Reproductive biology in relation to phylogeny of the Orchidaceae especially the tribe Diurideae.},
	year = {1995},
	note = {ORCHIDS q169. LM. Protocorm morph. Orch:Acianthus, Altensteinia, Adenochilus Anacamptis, Anneliesia, Aphyllorchis, Aporostylis, Apostasia, Arthrochilus, Beadlea, Bipinnula, Bletilla, Bromheadia, Bulbophyllum, Burnettia, Caladenia, Calanthe, Caleana, Calochilus, Cattleya, Cephalanthera, Ceratostylis, Cheirostylis, Chiloglottis, Chiloschista, Chloraea, Cleisostoma, Codonorchis, Coelogyne, Coilochilus, Corallorrhiza, Corybas, Cryptostylis, Cymbidium, Cyrtostylis, Dactylorhiza, Dendrobium, Dipodium, Disa, Diuris, Drakaea, Drakonorchis, Elythranthera, Epiblema, Epipactis, Epipogium, Eria, Eriaxis, Eriochilus, Erythroorchis, Eulophia, Gastrodia, Gavilea, Genoplesium, Geordorum, Glossodia, Gonatostylis, Grammatophyllum, Habenaria, Herminium, Inobulbon, Leporella, Leptoceras, Liparis, Listera, Lyperanthus, Melaxis, Megastylis, Microtatorchis, Microtis, Miltonia, Mischobulbum, Monodenia, Neotinea, Neottia, Nervilia, Neuwiedia, Oberonia, Octarrhena, Ophrys, Orchis, Orthoceras, Pachyplectron, Paphiopedilum, Peristylus, Phaius, Phalaenopsis, Phreatia, Platanthera, Platylepis, Polystachya, Praecoxanthus, Prasophyllum, Pristiglottis, Pterostylis, Rhizanthella, Rimacola, Sarcoglottis, Serapias, Spathoglottis, Spiculaea, Spiranthes, Stenocoryne, Stenoglottis, Stenorrhynchos, Taeniophyllum, Thelymitra, Thunia, Townsonia, Tropidia, Tuberolabium, Vanilla, Zeuxine.},
	month = {1995///},
	pages = {339 p. + appendices},
	school = {Australian National University},
	address = {Australia},
	keywords = {Diurideae, Floral Morphology},
	author = {Clements, M. A.}
}
@article {1957,
	title = {Multicellular trichomes in tribe Diurideae (Orchidaceae): systematic and biological significance},
	journal = {Kew Bulletin},
	volume = {49},
	year = {1994},
	note = {SEM, LM. Acianthus, Adenochilus, Aporostylis, Arthrochilus, Burnettia, Caladenia, Caleana, Calochilus, Chiloglottis, Corybas, Cyrtostylis, Diuris, Drakaea, Elythranthera, Epiblema, Eriochilus, Genoplesium, Leporella, Lyperanthus, Microtis, Orthoceras, Prasophyllum, Pterostylis, Rimacola, Spiculaea, Thelymitra, Townsonia. Mycorrhizal zones of infection on collar/stem, root \&/or tuber. .},
	month = {1994///},
	pages = {569 - 579},
	keywords = {Diurideae, mycorrhizae, Root morphology},
	author = {Pridgeon, Alec M}
}
@article {1960,
	title = {Morphological and ontogenetic studies on the gynostemium of some Australian members of Diurideae and Cranichideae (Orchidaceae)},
	journal = {Telopea},
	volume = {11},
	year = {2005},
	note = {SEM of flower. Anatomical characteristics tabulated. Acianthus, Corybas, Caladenia, Eriochilus, Glossodia, Cryptostylis, Diuris, Orthoceras, Caleana, Chiloglottis, Lyperanthus, Rimacola, Microtis, Genoplesium, Calochilus, Thelymitra, Pterostylis.},
	month = {2005///},
	pages = {11 - 33},
	keywords = {Diurideae, Floral anatomy},
	author = {Kurzweil, H. and Weston, Peter H and Perkins, A. J.}
}
@article {1965,
	title = {Nomenclature notes arising from studies intro the Tribe Diurideae (Orchidaceae)},
	journal = {Orchadian},
	volume = {13},
	year = {2002},
	month = {2002/10//},
	pages = {437 - 468, 502{\textendash}503},
	keywords = {Diurideae},
	author = {Jones, David L and Clements, Mark A and Sharma, I. K. and Mackenzie, A. M. and Molloy, B. P. J.}
}
@article {1953,
	title = {The mycorrhizal relationships of Australian orchids},
	journal = {New Phytologist},
	volume = {87},
	year = {1981},
	note = {Caladenia, Glossodia, Elythranthera, Eriochilus, Leporella, Lyperanthus, Acianthus, Microtis, Prasophyllum, Diuris, Orthoceras, Thelymitra, Calochilus, Cryptostylis, Corybas, Drakaea, Arthrochilus, Chiloglottis, Caleana, Dendrobium, Cymbidium, Dipodium, Spiranthes, Pterostylis, Phalaenopsis, Vanda, Robiquetia, Taeniophyllum, Rhinerrhiza, Sarcochilus, Pteroceras, Peristeranthus, Thrixspermum, Plectorrhiza, Pomatocalpa, Saccolabiopsis, Trichoglottis. No anatomy.},
	month = {1981///},
	pages = {371 - 381},
	keywords = {Diurideae, mycorrhizae},
	author = {Warcup, J. H.}
}
@article {1929,
	title = {Subterranean axes in tribe Diurideae (Orchidaceae): Morphology, anatomy, and systematic significance},
	journal = {American Journal of Botany},
	volume = {82},
	year = {1995},
	note = {LM. 145 spp., 37 gen. Dropper/stolonoid root \& stem tuber anat. Acianthus (3 spp.), Adenochilus, Aporostylis, Arthrochilus (3), Burnettia, Caladenia (21), Caleana (2), Calochilus (3), Chiloglottis (3),  Chloraea, Coilochilus, Corybas (6), Cryptostylis (2), Cyanicula, Cyrtostylis, Disa, Diuris (11), Drakaea (3), Drakonorchis, Elythranthera (2), Epiblema, Eriochilus (3), Genoplesium (2), Glossodia, Leporella, Leptoceras, Lyperanthus (3), Megastylis (4), Microtis (5), Orthoceras, Praecoxanthus, Prasophyllum (11), Pterostylis (25), Rhizanthella, Rimacola, Spiculaea, Spiranthes, Thelymitra (13), Townsonia.},
	month = {1995/12//},
	pages = {1473 - 1495},
	abstract = {The morphological and anatomical nature of perennating storage organs of the predominantly Australasian orchid tribe Diurideae (Orchidoideae: Orchidaceae) as well as anatomical concepts in tribes Orchideae and Diseae of Orchidoideae have been problematic for 150 yr, reflected in conflicting or vague terminology and questions about polystely and even monophyly of Orchidoideae. From a representative survey of underground organs of 145 species in 37 ingroup genera (Diurideae) and two outgroup genera (Spiranthes and Disa), the so-called "root-stem tuberoids" are here interpreted as root tubers (except for the stem tubers of Rhizanthella) borne on either droppers or stolonoid roots. All root tubers examined are bounded by a 1-4 layered velamen and exodermis, whereas droppers and stolonoid roots may have velamen-exodermis or a simple epidermis depending on the taxon and often bear multiseriate or uniseriate trichomes associated with mycorrhiza (as do roots of some taxa). The "polystely" reported in tubers of many Orchideae also occurs in tubers of many Diurideae but represents only dissection of the siphonostele into 2-13 traces. Cladistic analyses of data show extraordinarily high levels of homoplasy in characters related to root, dropper/stolonoid root, and tuber, so that these characters alone are of limited usefulness.},
	keywords = {Diurideae, Root anatomy},
	url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/2446176},
	author = {Pridgeon, Alec M and Chase, Mark W}
}
@article {1930,
	title = {A phylogenetic analysis of Diurideae (Orchidaceae) based on plastid DNA sequence data},
	journal = {American Journal of Botany},
	volume = {88},
	year = {2001},
	month = {2001/01//},
	pages = {1903 - 1914},
	abstract = {DNA sequence data from plastid matK and trnL-F regions were used in phylogenetic analyses of Diurideae, which indicate that Diurideae are not monophyletic as currently delimited. However, if Chloraeinae and Pterostylidinae are excluded from Diurideae, the remaining subtribes form a well-supported. monophyletic group that is sister to a "spiranthid" clade. Chloraea, Gavilea, and Megastylis pro parte (Chloraeinae) are all placed among the spiranthid orchids and form a grade with Pterostylis leading to a monophyletic Cranichideae. Codonorchis, previously included among Chloraeinae, is sister to Orchideae. Within the more narrowly delimited Diurideae two major lineages are apparent. One includes Diuridinae, Cryptostylidinae, Thelymitrinae, and an expanded Drakaeinae; the other includes Caladeniinae s.s.. Prasophyllinae, and Acianthinae. The achlorophyllous subtribe Rhizanthellinae is a member of Diurideae, but its placement is otherwise uncertain. The sequence-based trees indicate that some morphological characters used in previous classifications, such as subterranean Storage organs, anther position, growth habit, fungal symbionts, and pollination syndromes have more complex evolutionary histories than previously hypothesized. Treatments based upon these characters have produced conflicting classifications, and molecular data offer a tool for reevaluating these phylogenetic hypotheses.},
	keywords = {Diurideae, Molecular Phylogeny},
	author = {Kores, Paul and Molvray, Mia and Weston, Peter H and Hopper, Stephen D and Brown, Andrew P and Cameron, Kenneth M and Chase, Mark W}
}
@article {1933,
	title = {Phylogenetics of Diurideae (Orchidaceae) based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions of nuclear ribosomal DNA},
	journal = {Lindleyana},
	volume = {17},
	year = {2002},
	month = {2002/09//},
	pages = {135 - 171},
	keywords = {Diurideae, Molecular Phylogeny},
	author = {Clements, Mark A and Jones, David L and Sharma, I. K. and Nightingale, M. E. and Garratt, M. J. and Fitzgerald, K.J and Mackenzie, A. M. and Molloy, B. P. J.}
}
@article {1925,
	title = {A phylogenetic analysis of Diurideae (Orchidaceae) based on plastid DNA sequence data},
	journal = {American Journal of Botany},
	volume = {88},
	year = {2001},
	month = {2001/01//},
	pages = {1903 - 1914},
	abstract = {DNA sequence data from plastid matK and trnL-F regions were used in phylogenetic analyses of Diurideae, which indicate that Diurideae are not monophyletic as currently delimited. However, if Chloraeinae and Pterostylidinae are excluded from Diurideae, the remaining subtribes form a well-supported. monophyletic group that is sister to a "spiranthid" clade. Chloraea, Gavilea, and Megastylis pro parte (Chloraeinae) are all placed among the spiranthid orchids and form a grade with Pterostylis leading to a monophyletic Cranichideae. Codonorchis, previously included among Chloraeinae, is sister to Orchideae. Within the more narrowly delimited Diurideae two major lineages are apparent. One includes Diuridinae, Cryptostylidinae, Thelymitrinae, and an expanded Drakaeinae; the other includes Caladeniinae s.s.. Prasophyllinae, and Acianthinae. The achlorophyllous subtribe Rhizanthellinae is a member of Diurideae, but its placement is otherwise uncertain. The sequence-based trees indicate that some morphological characters used in previous classifications, such as subterranean Storage organs, anther position, growth habit, fungal symbionts, and pollination syndromes have more complex evolutionary histories than previously hypothesized. Treatments based upon these characters have produced conflicting classifications, and molecular data offer a tool for reevaluating these phylogenetic hypotheses.},
	keywords = {Diurideae, molecular systematics},
	author = {Kores, Paul and Molvray, Mia and Weston, Peter H and Hopper, Stephen D and Brown, Andrew P and Cameron, Kenneth M and Chase, Mark W}
}
